industry · quantum risk

Crypto Assets & Quantum Risk Catalog

Risk: varies · Confidence: high · Reviewed: 2026-07-19

Verdict

Most public-chain assets inherit classical signature schemes (ECDSA, Ed25519, etc.). L2s and bridges add operator key concentration. This catalog tracks nuance—not one score for “crypto.”

Overview

isquantumproof.com is building a wave-gated catalog of digital assets and chains focused on one question: what actually breaks under quantum algorithms, and what should builders and institutions do about it?

Wave 1–4: majors, Polygon, COBOL. Wave 6a/6b: L1s, L2s, stables. Wave 6c: DeFi presence — Uniswap, Aave, Lido, EigenLayer, RWA, oracles, perps, and sector hubs.

Nothing here is trading advice. Use the links below for dossiers and “is quantum proof?” hubs.

What breaks

Assuming every token has identical quantum exposure
Ignoring bridges, custodians, and L2 key models

Mitigations

Start with chain cryptography profiles
Map custody and bridges as first-class risks
Use the free assessment for organizational posture beyond a single asset

FAQ

Why not list 5,000 tokens today?

Thin pages fail readers and search engines. We publish when cryptographic fields and unique intros are complete.

Where do I start?

DeFi hub: /is-quantum-proof/defi · UNI/AAVE/Lido: /crypto/uni · /crypto/aave · /crypto/ldo · L1s: /crypto/btc · Stables: /crypto/usdt.

Key concepts (technical dictionary)

Terms used on this page — open a definition:

Full technical dictionary →